Resource College Alumni

Each state has a set number of electoral votes passing district, so the candidate who gets the most votes in any offered state gets all of the electoral votes in that state, define plutocracy form Of government even if they only got it by a single vote! An electorate just counts the votes in their precinct till a clear winner emerges, and after that it's off to the Electoral College to elect the winner. So in that election, a vote for Ralph Nader did not counteract a vote for George Bush.

On top of more soldiers, we need to alter our rules of engagement so our armed force can let loose the full blast of their abilities. The Sunni triangle ought to be reduced to a stack of rubble like Berlin in WWII. No mosque or human guards must supply safe haven. These individuals only respect power; that is how you negotiate with them. You have to speak their language.

I wouldn't depend on the next administration for any enhancement whatsoever. The only thing in doubt at this moment is which nation President Clinton and Vice President Obama plan to ruin next. Obama is salivating at the prospect of pulverizing Pakistan. Hey, Obama - here's a Newsflash: Pakistan has nukes, and they just might be lured to use them.

Although joblessness is at a record high, we the American people are understood for our innovative minds and are capable to discover personal services or answers to assist repair what our federal government has not.

It is interesting to see how numerous of the challengers of Guantanamo Bay are now reluctant to accept the detainees that will be launched from the camp. Is this actually a matter of "we just look after our own", or is it a matter of "not in my garden, especially my own"? How could the nations that opposed against the imprisonment and torture of people now decline haven to those very same prisoners?

Will the system be safe? Think about the Hackers and problems we have today? What about the future of eGovernance or e-Democracy or e-Voting? You are most likely asking; What is E-Democracy anyhow? E-Voting? Do we even trust voting machines as it is? Future eGovernment efforts will undoubtedly require to have robust Responsibility and Transparency Acts and human involvement. But will that be enough for the eCitizen?

But a lot of us don't understand that back in 1953 the United States and British intelligence companies overthrew a popular democratically elected federal government in Iran. And subsequently installed the Shah as leader because country. The Shah ruled with an iron first for the next 25 years, up until the Iranian Revolution of 1978-1979 eliminated him from power. A lot for our love of flexibility and democracy. We overthrow a democratic government and install a dictatorship. This was done because we didn't like the method the democratic federal government corruption today was governing. timocracy,ochlocracy,autocracy meaning,kleptocracies,plutocracy game And we wanted a ruler that would do our bidding.

I will then inform them that we are a Federal Republic, the most recent design of government, and that we choose individuals to take workplace and then that individual either votes or makes yes to the laws. If they keep in mind the grange halls, I then ask the older individuals. Grange Halls were the normal place that individuals of each neighborhood would satisfy and vote yeah! or nah! on each and every law. Individuals voted on laws in those locations upwards to four times a year.