Resource College Alumni

Each state has a set variety of electoral votes passing district, so the candidate who gets the most votes in any offered state gets all of the electoral votes in that state, even if they just got it by a single vote! An electorate just counts the votes in their precinct until a clear winner emerges, and then it's off to the Electoral College to elect the winner. So because election, a choose Ralph Nader did not cancel out a vote for George Bush.

We constantly hear from the President and his fellow Republicans that there would be horrendous consequences if we withdrew from Iraq. OK. What consequences? If we left Iraq tomorrow, here's my guess on what would happen. There would be a blood-bath civil war in between the Shiites, Sunnis, previous Saddam's Bathe celebration militia, Al Qaida terrorists, Iranian moles, and a lots other fanatical groups, all at each others' throats. It would resemble another Palestine, where Fatah and Hamas terrorist groups are now at each other's throat for power.

A lot for Pakistan. I picture Hillary would wish toconcentrate onremoving Syria and Iran. They have a great deal of nerve, you understand, in concealing our oil under their deserts. timocracy,ochlocracy,autocracy meaning,kleptocracies,plutocracy game And then, obviously, the remainder of the hit list. Saudi Arabia. Kuwait. Wherever we're ordered to go.

On the other end of the hall, Bush refuses to face truth and declines to let loose the fury required to protect the triumph he claims he wishes to achieve. I was discouraged when Bush spoke as if the Iraqis were going to take the lead and we were to tag along in Baghdad. At the Battle of Yorktown French forces surpassed American. The battle for Iraq will show to be simply as decisive. It can not be left to chance.

We could use part of the hundreds of billions of dollars we conserve to hunt down Al Qaeda terrorists all over the world if we left Iraq now. They were the initial and still worst risk to our security. We could likewise develop a high wall in between us and Mexico to keep out Middle-East terrorists, and spend for security equipment at airports and all our harbors to examine every package and container being available in.

Well, let me say this for myself. I have strong views on the function of federal Government Corruption Today, tax policy, civil liberties, trade policy and a host of other things. However I would never desire an administration to try to execute policies all at when that would embody the depth and level of these views. Never ever. And anybody out there who does, at the minimum, require to reassess what the hell they are asking of a society.

For the purposes of this article, I will divide the media into two classifications: partisan and non-partisan. By partisan, I am not simply referring to a political party however any celebration, or pressure group, that has an axe to grind. Usually partisan media is biased either to the left or to the right of politics. Some outlets claim to be in the middle however reserve the right to take a view on specific issues. Some others exist to promote - or decry - a specific concern or minimal basket of problems.