Getting Rid Of The Present Of Democracy In Iraq

Getting Rid Of The Present Of Democracy In Iraq
Description

Will the system be safe? Consider the Hackers and issues we have today? What about the future of eGovernance or e-Democracy or e-Voting? You are most likely asking; What is E-Democracy anyway? E-Voting? Do we even trust ballot machines as it is? Future eGovernment initiatives will certainly need to have robust Accountability and Transparency Acts and human participation. However will that suffice for the eCitizen?

Here in the United States, we are undoubtedly lucky. When your town and city conferences take place, go and discover about the working of your local process. When you see something you don't understand, ask questions. It is your right as well as your obligation to take part when it comes up for conversation or a vote.

If we had genuine democracies, the individuals would decide on any policy of federal government. It would be individuals as legislators?and enforcers, by the method. But that doesn?t go far enough either. If we really had a democracy, that is, a system of federal government corruption today responsive to the desires of individuals, then an official would have to use a gadget that would track what individuals want. And when a majority is reached either to do an act or not do it, the official would need to either do it or cease doing it depending. Which would be real even to the level of what is said or not said. The will of the people would rule if the individuals do not want a specific official to use a specific word. Vox populi, vox dei. The desires of the individuals are the only thing that matters.

Time and again I have heard the stories of our solders being court marshaled for doing their task. How can you send young men and females into battle and then charge them with a criminal offense for shooting initially and asking questions later?

Don't get me wrong. I'm not complaining about the way and the system it works. It's just that I desire individuals to entirely understand what they have defended, what they believe in, and what they are safeguarding. I love it here, and would never amuse the thought of going in other places, however I do comprehend what America really is.

Brian Schweitzer, the governor Montana, wrote an article that offers insights to his state's existing spending plan surplus. This year it is $433 million, proportionally comparable to a federal surplus of $858 billion. How was this attained in these struggling times?

timocracy,ochlocracy,autocracy meaning,kleptocracies,plutocracy game Pastor Wurmbrand wrote of pastors and bishopsincreasing one behind the other to state that communism and Christianity were basically the very same and might co-exist. He spoke worryinga country that was being taken in by the samefaulty political viewpoints as are now typical in America.

Now I definitely understand the advantages of the democracy we have. I learned that in school years ago. But what they didn't teach us was that a democracy has its downsides.

Brief descriptionWill the system be safe? Consider the Hackers and issues we have government corruption today? What about the future of eGovernance or Plutocracy Examples e-Democracy or e-Voting? You are most likely asking; What is E-Democracy anyway? E-Voting? Do we even trust ballot machines as it is?

Group activity

    • Frantz
      Will the system be safe? Consider the Hackers and issues we have today? What about the future of eGovernance or e-Democracy or e-Voting? You are most likely asking; What is E-Democracy anyway? E-Voting? Do we even trust ballot machines as it is?...

    Group blogs

    No blog posts

    Group bookmarks

    No bookmarks

    Group discussions

    No discussions

    Group files

    No files.

    Group pages

    No pages created yet