Resource College Alumni

Well, let me say this for myself. I have strong views on the function of government, tax policy, civil rights, trade policy and a host of other stuff. But I would never want an administration to try to execute policies simultaneously that would embody the depth and level of these views. Never. And anyone out there who does, at the minimum, need to rethink what the hell they are asking of a society.

Fretting about data posted on the stock exchange fixes absolutely nothing. They are only numbers on paper, an illusion of money appearing or vanishing, before your eyes.

There is also the monetary fiasco that left the world hardship stricken. How did it occur? What was it we where not being outlined the financial affairs of the nation? What needs to change? Among the modifications I see is an overall reform of the stock exchange. How come that the reality of the financial position of the world where hidden for so long? How come the stock exchange was enabled to degenerate into a world wide non stop drifting poker game, with the brokers and fund supervisors having fun with our money?

Separately, we can predict a favorable attitude, by dealing with each day with hope for a better tomorrow. Focus on remembering the good ideas in your life. Many of which money can't buy, like your family, health or this great democracy we live in. Nobody can make federal government modification, yet thinking it can you sue the us Government change is necessary.

No, Democrats, you did not need to capitulate. You did not up the ante in this power poker video game. Your technique needs to be to refuse to pass ANY spending expense up until the President stops this war. If required, bring the federal government to a stop. Cut off all moneying to every department, every bureaucrat, every recipient of a federal government check. Hell, even stop the President's salary and the salary of his cabinet members.

I question if it will be called a kinetic action or can you sue the us government some such? Possibly timocracy,ochlocracy,autocracy meaning,kleptocracies,plutocracy game another humanitarian intervention? Or will we reach for the cause of supporting Liberty and Democracy?

The BBC, along with being consumed with class (a charming notion about having upper, middle and lower hairs of individuals) has actually frequently hailed the "end of deference". I, for one, agree that deference is not proper. I do however, feel that disrespect of politicians is incorrect. What they have forgotten is that politicians were chosen by us The Individuals. By revealing a disrespect to our political leaders, the unelected journos, producers and editors are revealing disrespect to us, Individuals. The unfortunate thing is that a free media that is not interfered with by federal government is surely a necessary element in a democracy. The arrogance and downright rudeness revealed by some broadcasters is undermining this concept and bringing totally free media into disrespect.